SA = 2lw+2lh+2wh
That depends on the figure whose surface area and volume you're finding. You could try a Google search for "volume of [figure name]" or "surface area of [figure name]".
No solid figure has a surface area equal to its volume. That would not be possible as the units of measure are different.
To find the surface area of the smaller figure, we can use the relationship between the volumes and surface areas of similar figures. The volume ratio of the larger figure to the smaller figure is ( \frac{2744}{729} = \left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^3 ), where ( a ) is the linear dimension of the larger figure and ( b ) is that of the smaller figure. Taking the cube root gives the linear scale factor ( \frac{a}{b} = \frac{14}{9} ). The surface area ratio, which is the square of the scale factor, is ( \left(\frac{14}{9}\right)^2 = \frac{196}{81} ). Given the surface area of the larger figure is 392 mm², the surface area of the smaller figure is ( 392 \times \frac{81}{196} = 162 ) mm².
The surface area to volume ratio decreases - assuming the shape remains similar.
On a very basic level, surface area and volume are both ways to measure 3-demensional figures.
v
That depends on the figure whose surface area and volume you're finding. You could try a Google search for "volume of [figure name]" or "surface area of [figure name]".
No solid figure has a surface area equal to its volume. That would not be possible as the units of measure are different.
it doesnt
If it's a 3 dimensional shape then it is volume otherwise it is surface area
To find the surface area of the smaller figure, we can use the relationship between the volumes and surface areas of similar figures. The volume ratio of the larger figure to the smaller figure is ( \frac{2744}{729} = \left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^3 ), where ( a ) is the linear dimension of the larger figure and ( b ) is that of the smaller figure. Taking the cube root gives the linear scale factor ( \frac{a}{b} = \frac{14}{9} ). The surface area ratio, which is the square of the scale factor, is ( \left(\frac{14}{9}\right)^2 = \frac{196}{81} ). Given the surface area of the larger figure is 392 mm², the surface area of the smaller figure is ( 392 \times \frac{81}{196} = 162 ) mm².
The surface area to volume ratio decreases - assuming the shape remains similar.
On a very basic level, surface area and volume are both ways to measure 3-demensional figures.
The surface area of a figure does not provide enough information to determine its volume. Indeed, it does no even determine its shape.The volume can have any positive value up to 474.018 cubic units.The surface area of a figure does not provide enough information to determine its volume. Indeed, it does no even determine its shape.The volume can have any positive value up to 474.018 cubic units.The surface area of a figure does not provide enough information to determine its volume. Indeed, it does no even determine its shape.The volume can have any positive value up to 474.018 cubic units.The surface area of a figure does not provide enough information to determine its volume. Indeed, it does no even determine its shape.The volume can have any positive value up to 474.018 cubic units.
To obtain the ratio of surface area to volume, divide the surface area by the volume.
Provided the shape remains similar, the surface varies as the 2/3 power of the volume. Or, to put it another way, the cube root of the volume varies directly as the square root of the surface area. Or, the square of the volume is in direct proportion to the cube of the area.
The trapezoid is a plane figure which has surface Area, but no volume but if there was a 3d figure your equation would be. The Surface Area of a trapezoid = ½(b1+b2) x h X Height of figure.