To determine if 003 is smaller than 005, you can compare the numbers by their value. Both are three-digit numbers, but when considering their actual values, 003 is equivalent to 3, and 005 is equivalent to 5. Since 3 is less than 5, it follows that 003 is indeed smaller than 005.
No, .002 is not larger than .005. In fact, .002 is smaller than .005. When comparing decimal numbers, the number with more digits to the right of the decimal point is often smaller when the leading digits are less than those of the other number. In this case, .002 is less than .005.
The highest value between 0.005 and 005 is 5. This is because 005 is equivalent to 5 in numerical terms, while 0.005 represents a much smaller value. Thus, 005 is greater than 0.005.
0.005 is smaller
Written as decimals, .005 is larger than .000005 so the answer is larger.
Yes, the third decimal place is smaller The numbers can be converted to scientific notation: 5x10-3 vs 8X10-3 The exponents are the same, so you check the "characteristic" (5 vs 8).
005 is thicker than 003
.003 is faster than .005
The smaller the value the closer it is to zero..003 < .01, therefore .003 is closer to zero.On a number line (not to scale):---(0)--(.001)-(.002)-(.003)-(.004)-(.005)-(.006)-(.007)-(.008)-(.009)-(.010)-(.011)Notice how .003 is closer to 0 than .010
.003-.005 inch
.003-.005
.003 in .005 ex cold
.003 intake and .005 exaust
.003 exhaust-.005 intake
Intake valve .003, exhaust valve .005.
A 5 day blastocyst will be 0.1 to 0.2 milleters (.003 to .005 inch) typically
vstar650..hot.........cold intake .007-.012 .003-.005 exhaust .012-.017 .005-.007 measurements in inch thousands
The highest value between 0.005 and 005 is 5. This is because 005 is equivalent to 5 in numerical terms, while 0.005 represents a much smaller value. Thus, 005 is greater than 0.005.