16 - 9 = 7.
Wiki User
∙ 2010-11-12 02:50:47Prime numbers cannot be square numbers.
A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.
An oxymoron. Prime numbers can't be square. Square numbers can't be prime. You can square a prime number: 3 x 3 - 32 = 9
Square numbers have too many factors to be prime.
No. By definition, the square root would be a factor so the number would not be a prime.
Prime numbers cannot be square numbers.
A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.
An oxymoron. Prime numbers can't be square. Square numbers can't be prime. You can square a prime number: 3 x 3 - 32 = 9
Square numbers have too many factors to be prime.
Prime numbers have two factors. Prime squares have three factors. Square numbers have an odd number of factors but that number varies.
No. By definition, the square root would be a factor so the number would not be a prime.
Absolutely not. A square number has an integer square root, so by definition it has at least one factor. Prime numbers have no factors
Prime numbers have two factors. All square numbers (other than 1) have more than that.
A [perfect] square number, by definition, has a factor which is its square root. As a result it CANNOT be a prime!
A semiprime or a prime square.
Numbers with more than two factors are not prime numbers
A prime number can't be divided, then it's not a square