5
There is no evidence of the distributive property in the expression.
The property used to rewrite 9x2 + 9x3 is the Distributive Property. Using the Distributive Property the expression can be rewritten as 9x2 + 9x2 + 9x2 or 27x2.
No.
No, it is not.
You can use the distributive property to factor the expression (2l + 2w). By factoring out the common factor of 2, you can rewrite the expression as (2(l + w)). This shows that the sum of (2l) and (2w) can be expressed as twice the sum of (l) and (w).
There is no evidence of the distributive property in the expression.
2f + 10 in distributive property
The property used to rewrite 9x2 + 9x3 is the Distributive Property. Using the Distributive Property the expression can be rewritten as 9x2 + 9x2 + 9x2 or 27x2.
5w
607*20 = 600*20 + 7*20
9
To rewrite ( 2(n + 2n) ) using the distributive property, you distribute the 2 across the terms inside the parentheses. This gives you ( 2 \cdot n + 2 \cdot 2n ), which simplifies to ( 2n + 4n ). Finally, you can combine like terms to get ( 6n ). Thus, ( 2(n + 2n) = 6n ).
(4 x 12) + (5 x 12) = 9 x 12 = 108
No.
To rewrite (3(4 + 5)) using the distributive property, you distribute the 3 to both terms inside the parentheses. This means you multiply 3 by 4 and 3 by 5: [ 3(4 + 5) = 3 \cdot 4 + 3 \cdot 5 = 12 + 15. ] So, (3(4 + 5) = 12 + 15).
To rewrite ( 9x + 4(2x + 20) ) using the distributive property, you first distribute the ( 4 ) across the terms inside the parentheses. This results in ( 9x + 4 \cdot 2x + 4 \cdot 20 ), which simplifies to ( 9x + 8x + 80 ). Finally, you can combine the like terms ( 9x ) and ( 8x ) to get ( 17x + 80 ).
No, it is not.