5
There is no evidence of the distributive property in the expression.
The property used to rewrite 9x2 + 9x3 is the Distributive Property. Using the Distributive Property the expression can be rewritten as 9x2 + 9x2 + 9x2 or 27x2.
No.
No, it is not.
To express (39 \times 5) using the distributive property, you can break down 39 into two parts, such as 30 and 9. This gives you (39 \times 5 = (30 + 9) \times 5). Applying the distributive property, you can rewrite it as (30 \times 5 + 9 \times 5), which simplifies to (150 + 45), resulting in (195).
There is no evidence of the distributive property in the expression.
2f + 10 in distributive property
The property used to rewrite 9x2 + 9x3 is the Distributive Property. Using the Distributive Property the expression can be rewritten as 9x2 + 9x2 + 9x2 or 27x2.
5w
607*20 = 600*20 + 7*20
9
To rewrite ( 2(n + 2n) ) using the distributive property, you distribute the 2 across the terms inside the parentheses. This gives you ( 2 \cdot n + 2 \cdot 2n ), which simplifies to ( 2n + 4n ). Finally, you can combine like terms to get ( 6n ). Thus, ( 2(n + 2n) = 6n ).
No.
(4 x 12) + (5 x 12) = 9 x 12 = 108
To rewrite ( 9x + 4(2x + 20) ) using the distributive property, you first distribute the ( 4 ) across the terms inside the parentheses. This results in ( 9x + 4 \cdot 2x + 4 \cdot 20 ), which simplifies to ( 9x + 8x + 80 ). Finally, you can combine the like terms ( 9x ) and ( 8x ) to get ( 17x + 80 ).
To rewrite (3(4 + 5)) using the distributive property, you distribute the 3 to both terms inside the parentheses. This means you multiply 3 by 4 and 3 by 5: [ 3(4 + 5) = 3 \cdot 4 + 3 \cdot 5 = 12 + 15. ] So, (3(4 + 5) = 12 + 15).
No, it is not.