93.53
* * * * *
Although not incorrect, there is an alternative view for rounding from 5 and according to that view, the answer is 93.52
The rule is: Round up or down so that the new last digit is even.
Rationale:
Some people advise you to round up 0.5 others say round down. The problem with that approach is as follows:
In the first case
If the number is 0.0 you don't need to round
If the number is 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 or 0.4 you round down
If the number is 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8 or 0.9 you round up
So 4 downs and 5 ups (and one no change).
Net Result: you introduce an upward bias.
In the other scenario, you introduce a downward bias through rounding.
Possible solution:
Round up from 0.5 half the time, round down the other half. That satisfies the bias problem but introduces another - that of reproducibility. If someone else were to look at your data would they round up/down the same way you did? Unlikely. You need a system which will round 0.5 up half the time and down half the time but where the decision is made for you.
Hence the best solution is the answer given above: Round up or down so that the new last digit is even.
Round 502.6507568359375 to the nearest hundredth is 502.65.
61.23 is at the nearest hundredth
The nearest hundredth is 0.01.
615.44 is at the nearest hundredth.
It is then 13.36 when rounded to the nearest hundredth
4.20
What is 50.55 round to the nearest hundredth
Round this number to the nearest hundredth 0.3636 ? Round this number to the nearest hundredth 0.3636 ?
Round 1.636363636 to the nearest hundredth is 1.64.
Round 552.836 to nearest hundredth
How do you Round 0.387 to the nearest hundredth
Round 502.6507568359375 to the nearest hundredth is 502.65.
134.90 is at the nearest hundredth.
32.60 is at the nearest hundredth.
28.51 is at the nearest hundredth.
4.66 is at the nearest hundredth.
61.23 is at the nearest hundredth