answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The simplest way is probably to plot the corresponding equality in the coordinate plane. One side of this graph will be part of the feasible region and the other will not. Points on the line itself will not be in the feasible region if the inequality is strict (< or >) and they will be if the inequality is not strict (≤ or ≥).

You may be able to rewrite the inequality to express one of the variables in terms of the other. This may be far from simple if the inequality is non-linear.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How do you solve a two variable inequality?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Solve the inequality and enter your solution as an inequality comparing the variable to the solution -3 plus x10?

Solve the inequality and enter your solution as an inequality comparing the variable to the solution. -33+x&lt;-33


Can you solve for a variable in an expression?

No, you can only simplify an expression. To solve for a variable, it must be in an equation.


solve the inequality and enter your solution as an inequality comparing the variable to a number?

x&gt;5


What must be done get a variable alone on one side of an equation or inequality in order to solve the equation or inequality the answeranswer has eighteen letters with s being the second?

isolate the variable


How do you solve -12 is less than or equal to -12?

You normally "solve" something when there is a variable involved. In this case there is no variable. All you have to do is decide whether it is true or false. If this is derived from an original equation (or, in this case, inequality) which involved variables, then if the equation (or inequality) without variables is true, it means it is true for ANY value of the variable. If it is false, the original equation (or inequality) can't be satisfied by any value of the variable.


Solve for a variable in an expression x plus 5?

An expression cannot be solved; an equation or an inequality may be.


How is graphing a two variable inequality similar to graphing a one variable inequality?

One variable inequality- graph the point on the number line then choose a point on the point, to the left and to the right to see what gets shaded. Two variable inequality- graph the line on grid paper then choose a point on the line, to the left and to the right to see what gets shaded.


Solve 3-3 2 plus -3 0?

There is no equation (nor inequality) in the question. There is also no unknown variable. So there is nothing to solve.


How do you solve an inequality if you are left with a negative variable?

In the case of an inequality, if you mulitply by a negative number, you have to reverse the direction of the inequality. E.g.: -x &lt; 10 becomes: x &gt; -10 (Here, I multiplied by -1, and simultaneously reversed the direction of the inequality.)


What do you do when you have a negative variable?

When you have a negative variable in an equation that you are trying to solve for, you multiply each side of the equation by -1. If it is an inequality such as &lt;, you would flip the sign to &gt; and vice versa.


What is it called when a when you get a variable alone on one side of an equation or inequality in order to solve the equation or inequality?

each of the four regions created on the coordinate plane by the x- and y-axes.


How do you describe the steps for graphing a two-variable linear inequality?

Hi