The methods vary widely, depending on the type of equation. The general principle is to do the same manipulation on both sides of the equation, trying to isolate the variable (leave the variable alone on one side of the equation). For example, if you have
x + 3 = 7
your objective is to have the "x" alone on one side, so you subtract 3 on each side. This results in:
x + 3 - 3 = 7 - 3
x + 0 = 4
x = 4
(You don't usually need to write down all these steps; they were included for clarity.)
coefficient
solve it
If you solve such an equation for "y", you get an equation in the slope-intercept form.
you can only solve for one in an equation so it can equal something
There is no such thing as "solving integers". You can solve an equation, which means finding all the unknowns in that equation, but you can't solve an integer.
coefficient
Sure. You can always 'solve for' a variable, and if it happens to be the only variable in the equation, than that's how you solve the equation.
you don't answer an equation, you solve an equation
solve it
If you solve such an equation for "y", you get an equation in the slope-intercept form.
It is not an equation if it does not have an equals sign. You could simplify it but not solve it.
How do you use division to solve a multiplication equation?Answer this question…
you can only solve for one in an equation so it can equal something
There is no such thing as "solving integers". You can solve an equation, which means finding all the unknowns in that equation, but you can't solve an integer.
it is not an equation (there no equality in it!)
Please solve this equation.
You solve the equation.