3(34+7) you will distribute the 3 with the 34 and 7 by multiplying them
102+21 then you add the two numbers
123
Yes.
no because distributive property is for multiple digit numbers.
You don't. The distributive property involves at least three numbers.
None whatsoever. You might find the distributive property useful when trying to calculate 39*74. Of course, if you are familiar with the 39 times table or the 74 times table, the distributive property is a complete waste of time! But somehow I doubt that level of arithmetic competence.
The property used to rewrite 9x2 + 9x3 is the Distributive Property. Using the Distributive Property the expression can be rewritten as 9x2 + 9x2 + 9x2 or 27x2.
Yes.
28ab
distributive property for (11-3)=
When using the distributive property to write an expression, you do not simplify within the parentheses before applying the property. The distributive property involves multiplying the term outside the parentheses by each term inside the parentheses. Once you have distributed the term, you can then simplify the resulting expression by combining like terms. Simplifying before distributing would result in an incorrect application of the distributive property.
no because distributive property is for multiple digit numbers.
72.divided 4 in distributive property
You don't. The distributive property involves at least three numbers.
They both use PEMDAS or Order of Operation
24 + 36 = (2 x 12) + (3 x 12) = 5 x 12 = 60
according to commutative property both the distributive laws are equal why to use two distributive laws
no
None whatsoever. You might find the distributive property useful when trying to calculate 39*74. Of course, if you are familiar with the 39 times table or the 74 times table, the distributive property is a complete waste of time! But somehow I doubt that level of arithmetic competence.