3115
when there is no radical in the denominator
You can't simplify it more in radical form
71 is a prime number, so there is no simpler form of radical 71 than radical 71.
Using a radical (square root) bar. I can't get one on the screen, but I'm sure you know what they look like. Example: fractional exponents can be rewritten in radical form: x2/3 means the cube root of (x2) ... write a radical with an index number 3 to show cube root and the quantity x2 is inside the radical. Any fractional exponent can be done the same way. The denominator of the fractional exponent becomes the index of the radical, but the numerator stays as a whole number exponent in the radical.
3115
easy, lets take radical negative 3 for example. you can take out a "i" because i = the radical negative one. There fore the answer is i radical 3.
2.018606997in radical form??
294 is an integer and there is no sensible radical form for it.
Well, let's take a moment to appreciate the beauty of numbers. If we want to express 11.31 in radical form, we can write it as √127. Every number has its own unique charm, just like every tree in a painting adds to the beauty of the whole picture.
2i radical 5 * * * * * No. it is ± i*radical(25) which is ± 5i. Not sure why the answer is requireed in radical form.
when there is no radical in the denominator
Rather than use your calculator to estimate numbers under a radical, simplify the radicals and leave them in the problem without plugging them into a calculator.
48 does not need to be put in radical form. But, it can be: √2304
That IS the simplest radical form.
You can't simplify it more in radical form
71 is a prime number, so there is no simpler form of radical 71 than radical 71.