0
With an indirect proof, you temporarily assume that the opposite of what you're trying to prove is true. For example, let's say I'm trying to prove that the sky is blue. With an indirect proof, I would first say: "Assume temporarily that sky is not blue..." and go from there. Eventually, I will reach a contradiction and with this contradiction I can assume that this route of thinking is false, therefore my proof must be true.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Rene
Rafa
TaigaAdd your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What term defined as anything that can distort data and lead to inaccurate conclusion?
error
What does the analysis of data lead to?
It leads to the result.AnswerNot always. Sometimes it leads you to confusion.
Which sample size out of a population of 1000 is most likely to lead to a valid conclusion?
Providing of course that a sample is representative of the population from which it is drawn, the bigger it is the more likely it will be to lead to a valid conclusion. Therefore, the best sample size when there are no restrictions, as in this case, would be one of 1000.
Where in the old testament is the quotation Matthew 17 10?
Any 'Study Bible' will lead you to your desired answer found in Malachi 4:5-6.
How can you explain the significance level of at statistics?
Significance Level (Alpha Level): If the level is set a .05, it means the statistician is acknowledging that there is a 5% chance the results of the findings will lead them to an incorrect conclusion.
