There is no plan so you can start with dat.
a = k/b when a is inversely proportional to b, where k is a constant.
It is an expression, not an equation and so cannot be proportional nor non-proportional.
Directly proportional relationship is F=ma, F is directly proportional to a. Inversely proportional relationship is v=r/t, v is inversely proportional to t.
Disproportional.If instead you're looking for the antonym of directly proportional, that would be inversely proportional.
Yes the Virginia plan was Proportional. The new Jersey plan was not
The proportional plan is where electors are awarded to presidential candidates in direct proportion to the # of votes they got.
There is no plan so you can start with dat.
The district plan is a plan in which people in authority choose elected officials. A proportional plan is where votes are given in direct relation to the number of people who voted.
It called for the states to have proportional representation.
It called for the states to have proportional representation.
Some potential flaws of the proportional representation plan include the complexity of the voting system, which can confuse voters, and the tendency for smaller parties to gain more power, potentially leading to unstable coalition governments. Additionally, there may be challenges in ensuring geographic representation and accountability to local constituents.
There is not a actual answer for this question you have to think about it and do 1
Using either the district plan or the proportional plan to reform the electoral College would NOT ensure that the winner of the popular vote become president.
The Proportional Plan of electoral votes prevents a single candidate from receiving a states victory. The votes are distributed according to the percentage. This flaw is eliminated with a winner take all states.
The Proportional Plan of electoral votes prevents a single candidate from receiving a states victory. The votes are distributed according to the percentage. This flaw is eliminated with a winner take all states.
Work is directly proportional to force; the amount of work done on an object is directly related to the force applied to it. More force results in more work being done.