Because irrational numbers are defined as real numbers which are not rational.
Because irrational numbers are defined as all real numbers which are not rational.
The set of real numbers is defined as the union of all rational and irrational numbers. Thus, the irrational numbers are a subset of the real numbers. Therefore, BY DEFINITION, every irrational number is a real number.
It is due to the fact that the set of real numbers is defined as the union of the rational and irrational numbers.
Yes but only if the denominator is 0 (so the quotient is not defined).
The Laplace transform of a function f(t), defined for all real numbers t ≥ 0, is the function F(s), defined by: : The parameter s is a complex number: : with real numbers σ and ω. A complex number is defined as a number comprising a real numberpart and an imaginary number part. An imaginary number is a number in the form bi where b is a real number and i is the square root of minus one. (Wiki search)
A real number is any number so yes it is always a real number * * * * * Except if the second number is 0, in which case the quotient is not defined.
Yes irrational numbers are real numbers that are part of the number line,
Because irrational numbers are defined as real numbers which are not rational.
Because irrational numbers are defined as all real numbers which are not rational.
The set of real numbers is defined as the union of all rational and irrational numbers. Thus, the irrational numbers are a subset of the real numbers. Therefore, BY DEFINITION, every irrational number is a real number.
It is due to the fact that the set of real numbers is defined as the union of the rational and irrational numbers.
Yes but only if the denominator is 0 (so the quotient is not defined).
Real numbers encompass any number along the number line, infinitely. Integers, whole numbers, natural numbers, etc. are are real numbers.
An imaginary number is a continuous quantity that is the square root of a negative number and cannot be represented on the real number line.
Real numbers are defined as the set of rational numbers together with irrational numbers. So rationals are a subset of reals, by definition.
Yes, However, it is not defined that way. It is defined as a number that cannot be expressed precisely as a ratio of two real numbers (a fraction). But that is equivalent to a non-repeating decimal.