If five storks catch five frogs in five minutes, then each stork catches one frog in that time. Therefore, 100 storks would also catch 100 frogs in the same five minutes, since they can all work simultaneously. Thus, it would take 100 storks five minutes to catch 100 frogs.
5 minutes; 5 minutes (unless the fish stock gets depleted and the storks have to find another lake!)
It'll take 4 because if 4 cats catch 4 mice in 4 minutes, it means it takes 1 minute for one cat to catch 1 mouse. So if 10 cats were the answer, the question would be, how many cats will it take to catch 10 mice in four minutes. This question is obvious...
it's basically impossible because you know that it takes 1 cat to catch 1 mouse, so that means it takes 100 cats to catch 100 mice. But the question you have doesn't tell me how many minutes it takes for 1 cat to catch 1 mouse. e.g say it took 5 minutes for 1 cat to catch 1 mouse you times 5 by 100 and you get 500 so it would take 500 minutes for 100 cats to catch 100 mice. but your question doesn't have the time for how long it would take for 1 cat to catch 1 mouse. so therefore your question can't be answered.
In 30 min she would have traveled 22.5 miles so if you wanted to catch up to her in 30 min you would have to travel twice her hourly rate which would be 90 miles per hour Dave will catch Alice if he travels at any speed greater than she does, that is if he drives at any speed greater than 45mph. The factor which changes is the time it takes Dave to catch Alice (assuming they both keep driving at their relevant speeds): at 46mph, he will take 22.5/1 = 22 1/2 hours to catch her; at 55mph, he will take 22.5/10 = 2 1/4 hours to catch her; at 70mph, he will take 22.5/25 = 54 minutes to catch her.
Pip and Magwitch would catch either the steamer to Hamburg or the steamer to Rotterdam.
5 minutes
5 minutes; 5 minutes (unless the fish stock gets depleted and the storks have to find another lake!)
If 29 frogs can catch 29 flies in 29 minutes, it means each frog catches one fly in 29 minutes. Therefore, to catch 87 flies in 87 minutes, you would still need 29 frogs.
Storks typically catch prey, such as fish, frogs, and small mammals, with their sharp beaks and long necks. They use their keen eyesight to spot prey in water or on land, then use their beaks to quickly grasp and swallow their food whole. Storks are known for their patience and stealth when hunting.
1 hour and 40 minutes (100 minutes). 5 people take 5 minutes, 1 person takes 1 minute, so 100 people take 100 minutes to complete the task of catching 100 frogs.
you place them with storks
Since 1 swatbu can catch one spy every 5 minutes, each one could catch 20 spies in 100 minutes. The answer is 5.
No, they're fully aquatic so they would dry out
There are many things that would happen if something devastating happened between bees and marabou storks. These two animals are dependent on each other to survive.
Yes. Storks can swim quiet well, their swimming posture are similar to the herons or ducks. But they have the problem with taking off from the water and their feathers can get wet quicklier than other waterbirds so its rare to see storks swimming.
If 5 cats catch 5 rats in 5 minutes, that means each cat catches one rat in 5 minutes. So, to catch 100 rats in 100 minutes, you'd need 100 cats. But let's be real, if you have 100 cats running around trying to catch rats, you probably have bigger problems to deal with.
The belief that storks carry babies is a myth or folklore that originated in various cultures to explain how babies are delivered. In reality, babies are not delivered by storks, but are born from their human parents after a natural process of conception, pregnancy, and birth.