it's basically impossible because you know that it takes 1 cat to catch 1 mouse, so that means it takes 100 cats to catch 100 mice. But the question you have doesn't tell me how many minutes it takes for 1 cat to catch 1 mouse. e.g say it took 5 minutes for 1 cat to catch 1 mouse you times 5 by 100 and you get 500 so it would take 500 minutes for 100 cats to catch 100 mice. but your question doesn't have the time for how long it would take for 1 cat to catch 1 mouse. so therefore your question can't be answered.
It'll take 4 because if 4 cats catch 4 mice in 4 minutes, it means it takes 1 minute for one cat to catch 1 mouse. So if 10 cats were the answer, the question would be, how many cats will it take to catch 10 mice in four minutes. This question is obvious...
One cat can eat one mouse in one minute. There is one mouse for every cat, so it would take only one minute for all mice to be eaten.
5 minutes; 5 minutes (unless the fish stock gets depleted and the storks have to find another lake!)
It will take 3 minutes if you look at this problem mathematically. Both scenarios have a ratio of 1 rat to 1 cat. 3 minutes multiplied by 1/1 equals 3 minutes.
It does take 34 minutes.
It'll take 4 because if 4 cats catch 4 mice in 4 minutes, it means it takes 1 minute for one cat to catch 1 mouse. So if 10 cats were the answer, the question would be, how many cats will it take to catch 10 mice in four minutes. This question is obvious...
it takes 3 cats to eat 3 mice in 3 minutes. Meaning 3 cats can eat 99 mice in 99 mins. Those 3 cats will take 102 mins to eat one cat. YOu need one extra cat to eat the last mice. So the answer is 4 cats.
If it takes 5 cats 5 minutes to catch 5 mice, then it would also take 100 cats 5 minutes to catch 100 mice. Each cat catches one mouse in one minute, so the time it takes depends on the number of cats, not the number of mice.
first of all, it depends on wthe mice where the mice are. if they are in a small space, it would only take a few cats, whereas, if were scattered all over a three story house, it might take a while. anyway, generally, it would take about 45-50 cats.
Sailors take cats for many reasons one of them is to catch mice
1
If 5 cats catch 5 rats in 5 minutes, that means each cat catches one rat in 5 minutes. So, to catch 100 rats in 100 minutes, you'd need 100 cats. But let's be real, if you have 100 cats running around trying to catch rats, you probably have bigger problems to deal with.
they can see in the dark and the have to be able to see very well to catch mice, rats, and rabbits
One cat can eat one mouse in one minute. There is one mouse for every cat, so it would take only one minute for all mice to be eaten.
u can buy poison to kill them you know the onethat kills only the mice andsafe for the human,,,or the best remedy for thatis to take care of cats,only if you like it b'cos u know cats are enemy of mice and cats eat mice..
It would still take 3 minutes according to the setup of the question, assuming there are enough rats to make this work. It takes 1 cat 3 minutes to find a rat, and 3 minutes for 3 cats to each find a rat. So 100 cats would only take 3 minutes to find 100 rats. Time is irrelevant since the only factors changing are the cats and the rats. However, this question assumes too many things that would likely not happen. The question assumes an even density of rats, that the cat's are equally able to catch rats, and that there are enough rats.
The 'function' of big cats is to take out the old, weak and sick specimens in a herd of grazers, because they are the easiest to catch prey. That way they ensure that the strong and healthy survive and that only they will produce offspring.