dick
2
In an inequality, you have to shade a side of a line to see show if the possible answers are greater than or equal to it
No. You can solve an inequality in a similar way to an equation, but you end up with a range of answers (like X > 3) for each variable rather than set of exact answers (like X = 3)
-6
dick
There are many possible answers but the simplest is |x + 2| = 8
2
In an inequality, you have to shade a side of a line to see show if the possible answers are greater than or equal to it
No. You can solve an inequality in a similar way to an equation, but you end up with a range of answers (like X > 3) for each variable rather than set of exact answers (like X = 3)
An inequality is actually an equation. It is solved just like an equation, except it has no exact answer. Instead many numbers will satisify the inequality.For this reason the answers on a inequality are plotted on a number line.The answers are also written as a set of numbers.In mathematics, an inequality is a statement about the relative size or order of two objects, or about whether they are the same or not (See also: equality). *The notation a < b means that a is less than b. *The notation a > b means that a is greater than b. ...
four more than three times a number is gareater than twenty - two
The question contains an expression: neither an equation nor an inequality. Expressions cannot have answers.
Libertarianism without inequality has 168 pages.
2
No, it can be an inequality, such as x+5>2. An inequality usually has (infinitely) many solutions.
Gender inequality already exists and has done so for many thousands of years.