Yes, it would have to If it weren't for leap years, it would happen every 7 years. Since there are leap years, call it 28 years.
It depends on when you start - whether in a leap year or not, whether your time span includes a xy00 year or not. So there is no simple answer.
Two leap years individually are 2 years. If you mean starting from one leap year up to and including the next leap year, then that is 5 individual years. For example, the last leap year was 2012 and the next is 2016. So that is 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016.
10788 29 x 365 + (7 leap years so) 7
well, in one normal year there are 365 days, so common sense would indicate it to be 365,000. However, you have to take leap years into account, so if we say that year 4 is the first leap year, in 1000 years there will be 250 leap years, so add the two together show that in 1000 years there are 365,250 days.
Leap year every 4 years, so there are 10 leap years: (365 x 40) + 10 = 14,610 days
There can be up to 58, as it does depend on the span of the 237 years. Years divisible by 100, but not by 400 are not leap years. So 2000 was a leap year, but 1900 wasn't and but 2100 won't be.
There are 4 years between every leap year. Correction: There are 4 years between MOST leap years. That's the case 99.25% of the time. For the other 0.75% of the time, there are 8 years between leap years.
73,000 days not counting leap years. 50 possible leap years. So 73,050 total.
Leap years are only something that occur on Earth, so there is no such thing as a Mercury leap year.
A leap year is every 4 years, with the exception of years that can be divided by 100 and cannot be divided by 400. So 1900 was not a leap year, but 2000 was.
2004 and 2008 were leap years while 2005, 2006 and 2007 were not leap years. So just 2 years if you are including 2004 and 2008 and none if you exclude both of them.2004 and 2008 were leap years while 2005, 2006 and 2007 were not leap years. So just 2 years if you are including 2004 and 2008 and none if you exclude both of them.2004 and 2008 were leap years while 2005, 2006 and 2007 were not leap years. So just 2 years if you are including 2004 and 2008 and none if you exclude both of them.2004 and 2008 were leap years while 2005, 2006 and 2007 were not leap years. So just 2 years if you are including 2004 and 2008 and none if you exclude both of them.2004 and 2008 were leap years while 2005, 2006 and 2007 were not leap years. So just 2 years if you are including 2004 and 2008 and none if you exclude both of them.2004 and 2008 were leap years while 2005, 2006 and 2007 were not leap years. So just 2 years if you are including 2004 and 2008 and none if you exclude both of them.2004 and 2008 were leap years while 2005, 2006 and 2007 were not leap years. So just 2 years if you are including 2004 and 2008 and none if you exclude both of them.2004 and 2008 were leap years while 2005, 2006 and 2007 were not leap years. So just 2 years if you are including 2004 and 2008 and none if you exclude both of them.2004 and 2008 were leap years while 2005, 2006 and 2007 were not leap years. So just 2 years if you are including 2004 and 2008 and none if you exclude both of them.2004 and 2008 were leap years while 2005, 2006 and 2007 were not leap years. So just 2 years if you are including 2004 and 2008 and none if you exclude both of them.2004 and 2008 were leap years while 2005, 2006 and 2007 were not leap years. So just 2 years if you are including 2004 and 2008 and none if you exclude both of them.
Yes, it would have to If it weren't for leap years, it would happen every 7 years. Since there are leap years, call it 28 years.
4, because there is one every four years and there was one in 2008. So there has been one in 1996, 2000, 2004, and 2008 have been leap years. In general, a year is a leap year if it is evenly divisible by 4. Most people also remember the exception which is a year is not a leap year if it ends in "00" (ie., the year is even divisable by 100). So years like 1972, 1980, and 1996 are leap years, but 1800 and 1900 are not. So why then is a 2000 a leap year? What many folks do not realize is that the 100 year exception itself has an exception. Years that are evenly divisable by 400 are leap years. So 2000 as well as 2400 will be leap years.
Generally, every fourth year is a leap year. However, "century" years like 1800 and 1900 are not leap years unless they are divisible by 400. So 2000 _was_ a leap year.
Leap years are any years evenly divisible by four, with two exceptions. So years like 2004 and 2008 are leap years.The two exceptions:Any "century" year evenly divisible by 100 is NOT a leap year, so 1900 was not a leap year and 2100 will not be a leap year, except:Any year number divisible by 400 IS a leap year, so 2000 was and 2400 will be leap years.Of the 1000 years between 2001 and 3000, there are 250 "divisible by 4" years, minus 10 "century" years plus 2 "divisible by 400" years (2400 and 2800) gives 242 leap years between 2001 and 3000. Add 2000, and there are 243 leap years between 2000 and 3000, inclusive.
There can be. Years divisible by 100, but not by 400 are not leap years. So 1900 was not a leap year and 2100 will not be a leap year. The year 2000 was a leap year, because it was divisible by 400. So some double zero years can be a leap year. The next will be 2400.