None.Square feet are a measure of area;Linear yards are a measure of lengthand have no width.Area is length times widtharea_of_linear_yard = 1 linear yard x 0 linear yard= 0 square yards= 0 square feet
Three feet per yard.
There are 36 inches in a in a yard, so 10 LINEAR yards would equal 360 LINEAR inches.
3 feet = 1 linear yard =>9 square feet equals 1 square yard.
its the same
3 feet equals 1 yard
A length of 1 yard is 1 linear yard!
First, forget the word "linear". That word tells you nothing. The length in meters or in yards are always linear. 1 meter is 1.09361 yards. 1 yard is 0.9144 meters. When 1 meter costs 20.10, then 1 yard costs 18.38.
You can't convert between square units and linear units.
One, it is a linear measurement.
The answer is "none." There are three linear feet in a linear yard; therefore, there are nine square feet (3 x 3) in a square yard.
There are no yards in a cubic yard, because a yard is a linear unit of distance, whereas a cubic yard is a spacial unit of volume. A cubic yard is the volume occupied by a cube that measures one yard -- that's one linear yard -- on each edge. Since a linear yard equals three linear feet, a cubic yard is equal to 3 x 3 x 3 = 27 cubic feet.
Zero. Yards, which are linear measurement units, have nothing to do with gallons, which are volume units.
3 feet = 1 yard So it is: 9000/3 = 3000 yards
The exact value is 9.3635 so I would say probably 9.37
None, since there can be no conversion.A linear yard is a measure of length in 1-dimensional space while a square inch is a measure of area in 2-dimensional space. The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, any attempt at conversion from one to the other is fundamentally flawed.
None, since there can be no conversion.A linear yard is a measure of length in 1-dimensional space while a square foot is a measure of area in 2-dimensional space. The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, any attempt at conversion from one to the other is fundamentally flawed.