9
Consecutive numbers implies integers. Rational or real numbers are infinitely dense so there is no "next" number. There can be no pairs of integers such that their product is a fractional number between 559 and 560.
The square of 3 is 9, which does not lie between consecutive integers. Perhaps you mean the square root of 3, which lies between 1 and 2.
The number line is set up so that integers are equally space. That is, the distance between two consecutive integers is, for example, 1 cm. (or some other convenient distance). Also, the numbers are usually labeled; you should therefore have no trouble finding them. If you have one integer, the next number (one more) is one unit to the right (at least, that's the standard way to show a number line).
There is no such thing as consecutive numbers because numbers are infinitely dense. Between any two numbers there is another and so there is no such thing as a "next" number.There are no integers (square or non-square) between any two consecutive integers. There are infinitely many numbers between any two consecutive integers and, if the integers are non-negative, every one of these will be a square of some number so the answer is none. If the integers are negative then the infinitely many numbers will have a square root in the complex field but not in real numbers. In this case the answer is either none or infinitely many, depending on the domain.
An integer is a whole number. The two consecutive integers that equal 25 are 12 and 13.
not necessarily... An integer is a rational number, but so is any real number between consecutive integers.
The sum of two consecutive integers will always be an odd number.
75 lies between two consecutive even integers, 74 and 76. The square root of 75 lies between 8 and 9.
Consecutive numbers implies integers. Rational or real numbers are infinitely dense so there is no "next" number. There can be no pairs of integers such that their product is a fractional number between 559 and 560.
There are not two consecutive odd integers. An integer is a whole number and consecutive is something that follows continuously/unbroken, logical sequence. All odd integers will have an even integer in between: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5...
The square of 3 is 9, which does not lie between consecutive integers. Perhaps you mean the square root of 3, which lies between 1 and 2.
No.The sum of any number of even integers, consecutive or not, MUST be even. 219 is not even.No.The sum of any number of even integers, consecutive or not, MUST be even. 219 is not even.No.The sum of any number of even integers, consecutive or not, MUST be even. 219 is not even.No.The sum of any number of even integers, consecutive or not, MUST be even. 219 is not even.
There are no two consecutive integers that sum to 58. With two consecutive integers, one is even, the other is odd. The sum of an even number and an odd number is odd. 58 is even so cannot be the sum of two consecutive integers.
You add one at a time. For example, if you want to find three consecutive integers, starting with 10, you add 1 at a time to get 10 (the initial number), followed by 11 and 12.
A discontinuous variable is a variable that has distinct categories. Blood type is a good example. You could be A, B, AB or O. This contrasts with a continuous variable such as height or weight, where there are an almost infinite number of possible values. Data for discontinuous variables is usually represented using a bar graph or pie chart, but never a scatter graph.
Between 2 and 3.
Between 3 and 4.