720080 =
700000 + 20000 + 80
or 7.2008 x 10^5
Well, isn't that a happy little question! To write 61 in expanded form, you can break it down into its tens and ones. So, 61 in expanded form is 60 + 1. Just like painting a beautiful landscape, breaking numbers into parts can help us understand them better.
It is 25*11*1195547.
202 would be 20 x 20 in expanded form.
Seven Hundred and Nine
2 + 0.1 + 0.06
Well, isn't that a happy little question! To write 61 in expanded form, you can break it down into its tens and ones. So, 61 in expanded form is 60 + 1. Just like painting a beautiful landscape, breaking numbers into parts can help us understand them better.
8,325 in expanded form using exponents is: (8 x 103) + (3 x 102) + (2 x 101) + (5 x 100).
Sure thing, honey. To write 128 in expanded notation using exponents, you'd express it as 1 x 10^2 + 2 x 10^1 + 8 x 10^0. So, it would be 1 x 100 + 2 x 10 + 8 x 1. Easy peasy lemon squeezy.
It is 25*11*1195547.
To write 841 in exponents in expanded form, you would express it as ( 841 = 29^2 ). This is because 29 multiplied by itself (29 x 29) equals 841. In exponential form, the base is 29 and the exponent is 2, representing the number of times the base is multiplied by itself.
As a product of its prime factors in exponents: 2^3 times 5^3 = 1000
You can write it as 103. That would be the most common way, but there's many other correct ways to write it.
202 would be 20 x 20 in expanded form.
The expanded form of 702,500 would be: 700,000+2,000+500
I would say they are in standard form, but I would be more likely just to ask you to write a simplified number without using exponents. The terminology can vary, but the following example shows the usual names: 1,023 is in standard form. One thousand twenty-three is in word form. 1000 + 20 + 3 is in expanded form.
100 + 80
that is expanded form but you can also write it in scientific notation which would be 6.09 x10^2