If you estimate well, you get exactly 291.
explain how you would estimate to subtrac 189 from 643
348 is a pretty good estimate, I would say.
10 metres is not just a more reasonable estimate, it is the only estimate that anyone but an ignoramus would make.10 metres is not just a more reasonable estimate, it is the only estimate that anyone but an ignoramus would make.10 metres is not just a more reasonable estimate, it is the only estimate that anyone but an ignoramus would make.10 metres is not just a more reasonable estimate, it is the only estimate that anyone but an ignoramus would make.
I would estimate the value of 0.87 to be around 0.86999999...
The answer depends on what you want to use the estimate for. If it is being added to 1 billion, I would estimate it as 0. If adding to 25000, I would estimate it as 15000 and if adding to 0.075, I would leave it as it is.
900 would be a fair estimate
It depends on what I want to do with it. If I want to add 25 to it, I would estimate it as it stands but if I wanted to add 12365458756215486249868815 to it, I would estimate it as 0.In general, I would probably estimate it as 2.2*108.
I would estimate it as 712.9
900 would be a fair estimate
The answer depends on what you wish to do with the number.For 53.54/9 I would estimate it as 54. For 53.54*62 I would estimate it as 55.
If you estimate well, you get exactly 291.
explain how you would estimate to subtrac 189 from 643
Most people would estimate that as 6 (an overestimate) + 4 (an underestimate) which would estimate the answer as 10, which is an underestimate.
I would estimate that your chances are pretty good.
348 is a pretty good estimate, I would say.
900 is an estimate. But why would you want to estimate such a simple calculation?