To apply the distributive property to an algebraic expression, you multiply each term inside the parentheses by the number or variable outside the parentheses. For example, to simplify 2(x + 3), you would multiply 2 by both x and 3, resulting in 2x + 6.
The distributive property of multiplication deals with multiplying across a set of parenthesis. An example of this property would be, x(y+z) = xy + xz.
You would distribute the numbers for example 5(4+5) you would go 5*4 + 5*5and you get the answer which is 45.
This expression is as simple as it can be.Assuming you are multiplying by 3, an alternate way of writing it would be to open the parentheses (using the distributive law). But that won't be any simpler.
The distributive property is not related to finding equivalent fractions. The distributive property is a rule that states a(b + c) is equal to ab + ac. It is used to simplify expressions and perform operations like multiplication or addition. To find an equivalent fraction, you would need to multiply or divide the numerator and denominator by the same nonzero number.
To apply the distributive property to an algebraic expression, you multiply each term inside the parentheses by the number or variable outside the parentheses. For example, to simplify 2(x + 3), you would multiply 2 by both x and 3, resulting in 2x + 6.
First, I would find that the GCF of 20 and 16 is 4. Then, I would divide both 20 and 16 by 4. Last, I would use the distributive property to write the sum as 4(5 + 4).
The distributive property of multiplication deals with multiplying across a set of parenthesis. An example of this property would be, x(y+z) = xy + xz.
Wrong! See below. No, you cannot use the distributive property for subtraction. Let's say that your expression is: (5 + 4) - 3 We know that parentheses must be handled first, so we know that the correct answer is: (5 + 4) - 3 = 9 - 3 = 6. But let's say that you tried to use the distributive propertyand applied "- 3" to each term in the parentheses. You would get: (5 + 4) - 3 = (5 - 3) + (4 - 3) = 3 In fact, you would have subtracted not 3, but 6! * * * * * All very true except that this is the associative property - not distributive The distributive property, which IS valid, gives a*(b - c) = a*b - a*c
The distributive property is a property for multiplying with parentheses. It states that a(b+c)=ab+ac. The means that 3(x+2)=3x+6, for example. Basically, the distributive property says you must multiply everything within the parentheses by the number outside the parentheses.
You would distribute the numbers for example 5(4+5) you would go 5*4 + 5*5and you get the answer which is 45.
An example of how to use the distributive property: If you have 6x(5+4) you multiply 6x by 5 and get 30x. Then you multiply 6x by 4 and get 24x and then you would have 30x+24x which = 54x
No, because then there would be no need to call them by different names.
This expression is as simple as it can be.Assuming you are multiplying by 3, an alternate way of writing it would be to open the parentheses (using the distributive law). But that won't be any simpler.
The distributive property states that a(b + c) = ab + ac. This only works in your case if you meant to write 15(x + 20). That would equal 15x + 300.
The distributive property is not related to finding equivalent fractions. The distributive property is a rule that states a(b + c) is equal to ab + ac. It is used to simplify expressions and perform operations like multiplication or addition. To find an equivalent fraction, you would need to multiply or divide the numerator and denominator by the same nonzero number.
Yes, but it would be a pointless thing to do. The associative property is much more appropriate.