Yes
50
no; any negative number would be lower than 0 negative 50 would still be lower than positive 3
No, the square of a number is not always larger than the number itself. For positive numbers greater than 1, the square will be larger. However, for numbers between 0 and 1, the square is smaller, and for negative numbers, the square is always positive while the original number is negative, making the square larger in that context as well. Specifically, zero squared is equal to zero.
A negative number is less than zero.
A negative number.
4
50
any positive number is larger than a negative. a bigger negative number like -1000 is smaller than -500, which is smaller than 0, think about it like a number line.
95
no; any negative number would be lower than 0 negative 50 would still be lower than positive 3
Not always, if the smaller number is 0 or a negative number. Then their sum will be equal or less than the greater number.
-5.28
A negative number is less than a positive number. Think about it this way: a negative number is less than 0. A positive number is greater than 0. Therefore, a negative number must be less than a positive number.
That's a negative number.
No, the square of a number is not always larger than the number itself. For positive numbers greater than 1, the square will be larger. However, for numbers between 0 and 1, the square is smaller, and for negative numbers, the square is always positive while the original number is negative, making the square larger in that context as well. Specifically, zero squared is equal to zero.
It depends on the magnitude of the negative and positive values. Equal magnitudes equal zero. -2 + 2 = 0 Larger negative number than positive number equals a negative number. -3 + 2 = -1 Smaller negative number than positive number equals a positive number. -2 + 3 = 1
A negative number is less than zero.