No. And the proof is simple. Suppose there were such a number, X. Then X+1 is also a number and X+1 does not divide X.
The cube of any number, X is X*X*X
No. Not is x = 0 or if it an imaginary number.
x is a placeholder for a number. Depending what number you decide that x should be, it will be a prime number, or it won't.
If x is the given number and n is any whole number, then the question requires x = x*n which implies that x is zero.
no
No. And the proof is simple. Suppose there were such a number, X. Then X+1 is also a number and X+1 does not divide X.
The cube of any number, X is X*X*X
No. Not is x = 0 or if it an imaginary number.
If x is the natural number, 1/x is the reciprocal.
x is a placeholder for a number. Depending what number you decide that x should be, it will be a prime number, or it won't.
If x is the given number and n is any whole number, then the question requires x = x*n which implies that x is zero.
For every real number, x, which is not zero, there exists a real number x' such that x * x' = x' * x = 1, the multiplicative identity.
The x number comes first.
The next number in the pattern is 125.This pattern is determined by cubing the numbers.First number = 1 x 1 x 1 = 1Second number = 2 x 2 x 2 = 8Third number = 3 x 3 x 3 = 27Fourth number = 4 x 4 x 4 = 64Fifth number = 5 x 5 x 5 = 125etc.
Call your number any variable, for example x. Then: "A number": x "The opposite of a number": -x "Is": the equal sign. "The opposite of a number is -9": -x = -9
If the number is x, then abs(8-x) or |8-x|