2
eat chips
No, it would hit slower because gravity on the moon is 1/6 the gravity on earth.
Aha! A sparkler burns top to bottom only because you light the top. If you lit the bottom, it would burn bottom to top. If you lit the middle, it would burn both directions from the middle.
365 portions a year, or 366 portions in a leap year.
Their at the bottom of the tree because the hole point of a factor tree is to find the prime factorization of the number, so it would be at the bottom of the tree.
if it was a plastic bottom, it would melt. if it was a metal handle, it would burn you.
Because they are. They don't have to be but if you dropped one it would sink to the bottom. Also if they weren't they would be a bit difficult to lift due to the weight.
The penny will zig zag till it hits the bottom, the same way a a piece of paper would if you held it up and dropped it. It would be easier to drop a marble or a pebble.
Potato chips would dissolve faster because they are made out of less dense material
I would use a wired cage with a plastic bottom about 3 ft. tall and 3 and a half ft. long.
Not on the fish - but on the chips... YUMMY !
No the water would drain around the chips. They would not absorb water.
No or it would not be a diet, but if you ate the chips once a week,about 21 chips, it would be okay if you added them to your weekly dessert.
If you dropped a hamster on its back it would go into shock.
If you're thinking of the song about The Devil and Mr Chips, than that would be 'Chips' by The Real McKenzies.
It is mounted on the bottom side of the washer fluid plastic tank. That would be where the fluid gos in at.
Actually, it is science. The stone is more dense than the water therefore it sinks. If it was less dense, it would float. Density is science, not religion.