In a conditional statement, the part that directly follows "if" is called the antecedent or hypothesis. It represents the condition that must be met for the consequent, which follows the "then," to be true. For example, in the statement "If it rains, then the ground will be wet," "it rains" is the antecedent.
true
Conditional statement conclusions refer to the outcomes derived from "if-then" statements in logic. In a conditional statement, the "if" part is called the antecedent, and the "then" part is the consequent. The conclusion is valid if the antecedent is true, leading to the assertion that the consequent must also be true. For example, in the statement "If it rains, then the ground will be wet," the conclusion is that if it indeed rains, the ground will be wet.
If a conditional statement is true, it means that whenever the antecedent (the "if" part) is true, the consequent (the "then" part) must also be true. Therefore, if the condition is met, the conclusion drawn from that conditional must also be true. This reflects the logical structure of implication, where a true antecedent guarantees a true consequent. Thus, the truth of the conditional ensures the truth of the conclusion.
It is the start of a question. A statement would then follow as part of the question. It is asking you to read that statement and carry out the instructions in the first part of the question. Without the statement it is not possible to answer the question.
Conditional instructions are directives that specify actions to be taken based on certain conditions being met. They often follow an "if-then" format, where the action (the "then" part) occurs only if the condition (the "if" part) is true. These instructions are commonly used in programming, decision-making processes, and procedural guidelines to ensure that specific outcomes are achieved under particular circumstances.
The part of a conditional statement that follows the word 'then' is the conclusion.
In a conditional statement, the antecedent is the condition that must be met for the consequent to occur. The antecedent is like the "if" part of the statement, while the consequent is the "then" part that follows if the condition is satisfied.
In conditional statements, the antecedent is the condition that must be met for the consequent to occur. The antecedent is like the "if" part of the statement, while the consequent is the "then" part that follows if the condition is satisfied.
No, the conclusion of a statement, often referred to as the “consequent,” is the part that follows the “if” clause in a conditional statement. The "then" part is the antecedent. It is the part that comes first and sets the condition for the statement to hold true.
The IF part of a conditional statement sets the condition or criteria that needs to be met for the subsequent action to occur. It is the part that is evaluated as either true or false, determining the flow of the statement.
A conditional statement is indeed a statement that can be put in the form "if A, then B". The only time this conditional statement is false is when both A is true and also B is false.Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/What_is_a_conditional_statement#ixzz1lda5tB6E
the hypothesis
true
hypothesis
The antecedent is the "if" part of a conditional statement, while the consequent is the "then" part. The antecedent is the condition that must be met for the consequent to occur.
If you switch the "if" and "then" parts of a statement, you generally change the meaning of the statement. The original statement follows a conditional structure, where the "if" part is the hypothesis and the "then" part is the conclusion. Reversing them usually results in a different logical relationship, which may not hold true in all cases. This process is known as forming the converse of the original statement.
Conditional statement conclusions refer to the outcomes derived from "if-then" statements in logic. In a conditional statement, the "if" part is called the antecedent, and the "then" part is the consequent. The conclusion is valid if the antecedent is true, leading to the assertion that the consequent must also be true. For example, in the statement "If it rains, then the ground will be wet," the conclusion is that if it indeed rains, the ground will be wet.