Contrary claims
If you aren't dealing with algebra, such as x2+3x+21, then completing the square wont be able to solve the porblem, however if you are using algebra, and you cannot factorise, then completing the square will always work
An object cannot have more than one base. However a pyramid has 4 triangular FACES and a square BASE.
dont think so * * * * * A perfect square is a term that is normally used to refer to squares of integers and, in that respect, 1/9 cannot be a perfect square. However, it is the square of ± 1/3.
3 square root of 5 cannot be rationalised.3 square root of 5 cannot be rationalised.3 square root of 5 cannot be rationalised.3 square root of 5 cannot be rationalised.
None, because there can be no such thing as a triangular square. If it is triangular it cannot be a square, if it is a square it cannot be triangular.
Contrary claims
A square cannot be a corner and a corner cannot be a square.
If you aren't dealing with algebra, such as x2+3x+21, then completing the square wont be able to solve the porblem, however if you are using algebra, and you cannot factorise, then completing the square will always work
A surd is a square root which cannot be reduced to a whole number: however you need to be able to simplify them.
An object cannot have more than one base. However a pyramid has 4 triangular FACES and a square BASE.
dont think so * * * * * A perfect square is a term that is normally used to refer to squares of integers and, in that respect, 1/9 cannot be a perfect square. However, it is the square of ± 1/3.
3 square root of 5 cannot be rationalised.3 square root of 5 cannot be rationalised.3 square root of 5 cannot be rationalised.3 square root of 5 cannot be rationalised.
Of course not!A square cannot be a kite nor an arrowhead.A square cannot be a rectangle - whose adjacent sides are unequal.A square cannot be a rhombus - whose adjacent angles are unequal.A square cannot be a parallelogram - whose adjacent sides and adjacent angles are unequal.A square cannot be any polygon does not have 4 sides.A square cannot be a non-polygonal plane shape (circle, ellipse).A square cannot be a plane open area.A square cannot be a shape in 3 or more dimensions.I could continue, but I hope you get the idea.
None, because there can be no such thing as a triangular square. If it is triangular it cannot be a square, if it is a square it cannot be triangular.
You cannot in real numbers because the square of any number, negative or positive, is positive. However, -25 does have a square root in complex numbers: it is + or - 5i where i is the imaginary square root of -1.
No, you cannot be "square" on a radius in the traditional sense, as a radius is a straight line segment from the center of a circle to any point on its circumference. However, you can have a square inscribed in a circle, where the vertices of the square touch the circumference, but the concept of being "square" on a radius is not applicable.
A square is not an irregular shape and conversely. So the square of an irregular shape cannot exist.A square is not an irregular shape and conversely. So the square of an irregular shape cannot exist.A square is not an irregular shape and conversely. So the square of an irregular shape cannot exist.A square is not an irregular shape and conversely. So the square of an irregular shape cannot exist.