Contrary claims
If you aren't dealing with algebra, such as x2+3x+21, then completing the square wont be able to solve the porblem, however if you are using algebra, and you cannot factorise, then completing the square will always work
An object cannot have more than one base. However a pyramid has 4 triangular FACES and a square BASE.
dont think so * * * * * A perfect square is a term that is normally used to refer to squares of integers and, in that respect, 1/9 cannot be a perfect square. However, it is the square of ± 1/3.
3 square root of 5 cannot be rationalised.3 square root of 5 cannot be rationalised.3 square root of 5 cannot be rationalised.3 square root of 5 cannot be rationalised.
None, because there can be no such thing as a triangular square. If it is triangular it cannot be a square, if it is a square it cannot be triangular.
Contrary claims
A square cannot be a corner and a corner cannot be a square.
If you aren't dealing with algebra, such as x2+3x+21, then completing the square wont be able to solve the porblem, however if you are using algebra, and you cannot factorise, then completing the square will always work
A surd is a square root which cannot be reduced to a whole number: however you need to be able to simplify them.
An object cannot have more than one base. However a pyramid has 4 triangular FACES and a square BASE.
dont think so * * * * * A perfect square is a term that is normally used to refer to squares of integers and, in that respect, 1/9 cannot be a perfect square. However, it is the square of ± 1/3.
3 square root of 5 cannot be rationalised.3 square root of 5 cannot be rationalised.3 square root of 5 cannot be rationalised.3 square root of 5 cannot be rationalised.
Of course not!A square cannot be a kite nor an arrowhead.A square cannot be a rectangle - whose adjacent sides are unequal.A square cannot be a rhombus - whose adjacent angles are unequal.A square cannot be a parallelogram - whose adjacent sides and adjacent angles are unequal.A square cannot be any polygon does not have 4 sides.A square cannot be a non-polygonal plane shape (circle, ellipse).A square cannot be a plane open area.A square cannot be a shape in 3 or more dimensions.I could continue, but I hope you get the idea.
None, because there can be no such thing as a triangular square. If it is triangular it cannot be a square, if it is a square it cannot be triangular.
You cannot in real numbers because the square of any number, negative or positive, is positive. However, -25 does have a square root in complex numbers: it is + or - 5i where i is the imaginary square root of -1.
A square is not an irregular shape and conversely. So the square of an irregular shape cannot exist.A square is not an irregular shape and conversely. So the square of an irregular shape cannot exist.A square is not an irregular shape and conversely. So the square of an irregular shape cannot exist.A square is not an irregular shape and conversely. So the square of an irregular shape cannot exist.
it cant all sides have to be equilateral edit- a rectangle cannot be a square. however, a square can be a rectangle. reedit - A rectangle can be a square, however, a square must be a rectangle. A rectangle has four 90 degree angles, which a square also has. The rectangle has two pairs of equal length sides, which a square also has. The only additional requirement for a square is that the length of all four sides be equal, which is not ruled out for a rectangle.