No, 33 is an integer. 0.3333 repeating is a repeating decimal.
Repeating
0.72 repeating written as a decimal is 0.72 repeating
They can. And if you include repeating 0s and repeating 9s, then all rational numbers can be written with infinitely long repeating digits.
No, because repeating decimals never stop repeating, so it would be impossible to have a different number that does not repeat.
The address of the Islesboro Historical Society is: Po Box 301, Islesboro, ME 04848-0301
The address of the Alice L. Pendleton Library is: 309 Main Road, Islesboro, 04848 0077
It bears repeating is correct.
Yes it is. Repeating decimals are all repeating rationals.
No, 33 is an integer. 0.3333 repeating is a repeating decimal.
0.21000... with the 0s repeating or 0.20999... with the 9s repeating.
Repeating
0.72 repeating written as a decimal is 0.72 repeating
For a single repeating digit, it is a dot over the digit.For string of repeating digits, it can be a dot over the first and last repeating digits, or a bar over the repeating string.
0.18 repeating is greater than 0.18.thenon-repeating 0.18 = 0.1800while the repeating 0.18 = 0.181818...
444.44... repeating %
you use the decimal that is repeating and out that number twice. examples: .6 repeating= 66 percent 0.9 repeating= 99%