No, 33 is an integer. 0.3333 repeating is a repeating decimal.
Repeating
0.72 repeating written as a decimal is 0.72 repeating
No, 125 is not a repeating decimal. A repeating decimal is a decimal number that has a repeating pattern of digits after the decimal point. In the case of 125, it is a whole number and does not have any decimal places or repeating patterns. It can be written as 125.0000, but it is still a non-repeating decimal.
They can. And if you include repeating 0s and repeating 9s, then all rational numbers can be written with infinitely long repeating digits.
The address of the Islesboro Historical Society is: Po Box 301, Islesboro, ME 04848-0301
The address of the Alice L. Pendleton Library is: 309 Main Road, Islesboro, 04848 0077
The correct phrase is "bears repeating." In this context, "bears" is a verb meaning "to endure" or "to support." The phrase indicates that something is worth mentioning again because it is important or significant. "Bares," on the other hand, is the present tense of the verb "bare," meaning "to uncover" or "to reveal."
Yes it is. Repeating decimals are all repeating rationals.
No, 33 is an integer. 0.3333 repeating is a repeating decimal.
0.21000... with the 0s repeating or 0.20999... with the 9s repeating.
Repeating
0.72 repeating written as a decimal is 0.72 repeating
For a single repeating digit, it is a dot over the digit.For string of repeating digits, it can be a dot over the first and last repeating digits, or a bar over the repeating string.
0.18 repeating is greater than 0.18.thenon-repeating 0.18 = 0.1800while the repeating 0.18 = 0.181818...
444.44... repeating %
you use the decimal that is repeating and out that number twice. examples: .6 repeating= 66 percent 0.9 repeating= 99%