.0359 (9 repeating) would be the largest decimal smaller than .036, then anything less than .0359 (9 repeating) would be smaller than .036. the numbers are endless.
No, they are rational.
No An irrational number goes on forever with no repeating pattern.
It is an infinite non-repeating decimal which represents an irrational number.
Terminating and repeating decimals are rational numbers.
No, no repeating decimal is irrational. All repeating decimals can be converted to fractions. They are, however, non-terminating.
it is irrational
yes
No.
.0359 (9 repeating) would be the largest decimal smaller than .036, then anything less than .0359 (9 repeating) would be smaller than .036. the numbers are endless.
no
No, it is not.
No, it is rational.
No, they are rational.
Rashed
1/3. The full answer is irrational (0.3333 repeating) * * * * * The full answer, 0.33... repeating, is rational, not irrational.
No An irrational number goes on forever with no repeating pattern.