No, an irrational number by definition is a number that cannot be written as a fraction
yes* * * * *No it is not.
Rational.
No, 1/3 is not a natural number or even an integer. 1/3 is an irrational fraction and a real number.
An irrational number is a number that cannot be written as a ratio of two whole numbers. That is, there are no two integers, X and Y (with Y>0) such that the number can be written as X/Y. Sqrt(2), pi, log(3) are examples of irrational numbers.
3/8 is rational, it can't be irrational.
No, an irrational number by definition is a number that cannot be written as a fraction
no, the square root of any number (like 2) which does not have an exact value in fraction form is an irrational number. 3/4 is a rational number. Any number with integers in both the numerator and denominator (except 0) is a rational number.
yes* * * * *No it is not.
No. By definition, 3/8 is rational.
100/3 is a rational number
No. An irrational number is any number that is not a rational number; A rational number is any number that can be expressed as one integer over another integer. negative 3 over 4 is one integer (negative 3) over another integer (4), and so is a rational number.
Yes, it is an irrational number. It is because sqrt. root of 3 can't be expressed in the form p/q [where q isn't equal to 0].
Rational.
No; since pi is irrational if you multiply it by a rational number it is still irrational
No because 4/3 is a rational number
No.3*sqrt(2) and sqrt(2) are irrational. But their quotient is 3, which is rational.