No it isn't. Any number ending in the digit 5 is divisible by 5, and hence not prime.
3 is the smallest prime factor of 165.
3 x 5 x 11 = 165
As a product of its prime factors it is: 3*5*11 = 165 and no exponents are needed
165 55,3 11,5,3 3 x 5 x 11 = 165
no
No, 54 and 165 are not relatively prime.
The prime factors of 165 are 3,5,and 11.3, 5 and 11
165 is composite
3 is the smallest prime factor of 165.
prime factorization of 165 = 3 x 5 x 11
3 * 5 * 11 = 165 Divide by prime numbers until you get a final prime number
3 x 5 x 11 = 165
165 = 3 * 5 * 11
3 x 5 x 11 = 165
Numbers 3.5 and 11. The numbers are actually prime factors of 165 (165=3*5*11).
The prime factorization of 165 is 3 x 5 x 11
factorization of 165 is =3*5*11