answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

No it is not. To check - add all the digits together (in this case 2+6+9=17. If the sum of the digits can be divided exactly by 3, then the number itself will also divide by 3. In this case, 17 (the sum of the digits) does not divide exactly by 3.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

DevinDevin
I've poured enough drinks to know that people don't always want advice—they just want to talk.
Chat with Devin
BlakeBlake
As your older brother, I've been where you are—maybe not exactly, but close enough.
Chat with Blake
JordanJordan
Looking for a career mentor? I've seen my fair share of shake-ups.
Chat with Jordan

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is 2690 divisble by 3
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is the remainder when 2690 is divided by 3?

896.6667


Is 412 divisble by 3?

No.


Is 31 divisble by 3?

No


Is 998876 divisble by 3?

no


Is 454 divisble by 3?

No.


Is 121 divisble by 3?

NO.


Is 2690 divisible by 2 and 3?

By 2 but not by 3. 2690 is a multiple of 2 because it ends in 0 but it isn't a multiple of 3 because 2 + 6 + 9 = 17 and 17 isn't a multiple of 3


What is 72 divisble by?

2 & 3


What is 8901 divisble by?

It is divisible by 3.


Is 48 divisble by 3?

Yes


Is 75 divisble by 3?

Yes


What is 114 divisble by?

2 and 3.