No, and here is why: If you want to find out of a number is divisible by 3, you add up the numerals in the number, and see if that total is divisible by 3. In this case, we find that 2+6+9+0 equals 17. 17 is not divisible by 3, therefore, 2690 is not divisible by 3 either.
No:2,690 is divisible by 1, 2, 5, 10, 269, 538, 1345, 2690.
896.6667
No. 2,690 is not evenly divisible by nine.
416 is divisible by 2 but is not divisible by 3.
No, and here is why: If you want to find out of a number is divisible by 3, you add up the numerals in the number, and see if that total is divisible by 3. In this case, we find that 2+6+9+0 equals 17. 17 is not divisible by 3, therefore, 2690 is not divisible by 3 either.
No:2,690 is divisible by 1, 2, 5, 10, 269, 538, 1345, 2690.
1, 2, 5, 10, 269, 538, 1345, 2690.
896.6667
No. 2,690 is not evenly divisible by nine.
Yes, 5 × 538 = 2,690
123 is not divisible by 2 it is divisible by 3
416 is divisible by 2 but is not divisible by 3.
Yes, it is divisible by 2 because it ends with 2, it is also divisible bye 3 because 1+3+2=6. 6 is divisible by 3, therefor 132 is divisible by 3.
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 2 is divisible by 3
yep it is because 2 is divisible by 2 and 3 is divisible by 3 and 0 is divisible by 5 have fun suckers!
2+3+2+6=13 which is not divisible by 3 thus 2326 is not divisible by 3