By 2 but not by 3. 2690 is a multiple of 2 because it ends in 0 but it isn't a multiple of 3 because 2 + 6 + 9 = 17 and 17 isn't a multiple of 3
Chat with our AI personalities
No, and here is why: If you want to find out of a number is divisible by 3, you add up the numerals in the number, and see if that total is divisible by 3. In this case, we find that 2+6+9+0 equals 17. 17 is not divisible by 3, therefore, 2690 is not divisible by 3 either.
No:2,690 is divisible by 1, 2, 5, 10, 269, 538, 1345, 2690.
896.6667
No. 2,690 is not evenly divisible by nine.
416 is divisible by 2 but is not divisible by 3.