No, and here is why: If you want to find out of a number is divisible by 3, you add up the numerals in the number, and see if that total is divisible by 3. In this case, we find that 2+6+9+0 equals 17. 17 is not divisible by 3, therefore, 2690 is not divisible by 3 either.
No. 2,690 is not evenly divisible by nine.
By 2 but not by 3. 2690 is a multiple of 2 because it ends in 0 but it isn't a multiple of 3 because 2 + 6 + 9 = 17 and 17 isn't a multiple of 3
384.2857
896.6667
No, and here is why: If you want to find out of a number is divisible by 3, you add up the numerals in the number, and see if that total is divisible by 3. In this case, we find that 2+6+9+0 equals 17. 17 is not divisible by 3, therefore, 2690 is not divisible by 3 either.
No. 2,690 is not evenly divisible by nine.
1, 2, 5, 10, 269, 538, 1345, 2690.
Yes, 5 × 538 = 2,690
By 2 but not by 3. 2690 is a multiple of 2 because it ends in 0 but it isn't a multiple of 3 because 2 + 6 + 9 = 17 and 17 isn't a multiple of 3
2690
384.2857
6 is not divisible by 162. 162 is divisible by 6.
There are 10 millimetres in one centimetre. Therefore, 2690 millimetres is equal to 2690/10 = 269 centimetres.
896.6667
If it is divisible by 2 and 3, it is divisible by 6.
if a number is divisible by 2 and 3 then its divisible by 6