No
Of course, but the answer will not be a whole number.
1, 2, 149, 298
No, but 98 is divisible by 298/2 = 49
99.3333
1, 2, 4, 7, 14, 28, 149, 298, 596, 1043, 2086, 4172.
If x is an integer divisible by 3, is x squared divisible by 3?
1, 2, 149, 298
By these factors: 1, 2, 3, 6, 149, 298, 447, 894.
No, but 98 is divisible by 298/2 = 49
298
99.3333
No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.
It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.
1, 2, 4, 7, 14, 28, 149, 298, 596, 1043, 2086, 4172.
A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3.
If x is an integer divisible by 3, is x squared divisible by 3?
NO. 313 is not divisible by 3.A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of the digits is divisible by 3.313 = 3 + 1 + 3 = 7Note: 7 not divisible by 3 thus, 313 is not divisible by 3.
3 is not divisible by 126. 126 is divisible by 3.