1 is a factor of 4 that is not a multiple of 2.
No - nor is it a factor of 34.
The only prime factor of 4 is 2. No prime number is a multiple of 5.
Because 2 is a factor of 4. If a number is a multiple of four, when you add that it is a multiple of 2 there is no extra information, no additional factor.
No, but vice versa holds true. Case and point: 6 is a multiple of 2, but not a multiple of 4. 8 is a multiple of 4, and is a multiple of 2. Because a factor of 4 is 2, every multiple of 4 is also a multiple of 2. But since 4 is not a factor of 2, rather, only half of it, only half of the multiples of 2 will be multiples of 4.
1 is a factor of 4 that is not a multiple of 2.
4, 12, 20, 60
factor
No, 80 is a multiple of 4. 4 is a factor of 80.
multiple. 4 is afactor of 24
4 is a factor of 36 and 36 is a multiple of 4
4
No, 16 is a multiple of 4. 4 is a factor of 16.
No - nor is it a factor of 34.
No, 12 is a multiple of 4. 4 is a factor of 12.
The only prime factor of 4 is 2. No prime number is a multiple of 5.
No - a smaller number can never be a multiple of a number, only a factor. But 4 is not a factor of 62, either.