It is rational.
No, 5.3 is not an irrational number; it is a rational number. Rational numbers can be expressed as a fraction of two integers, and 5.3 can be written as 53/10. Therefore, since it can be represented as a fraction, it is classified as rational.
No. A rational plus an irrational is always an irrational.
No, 5.87 repeating (written as 5.877777...) is not an irrational number; it is a rational number. A rational number can be expressed as the ratio of two integers, and since 5.87 repeating can be represented as the fraction 53/9, it qualifies as rational. In contrast, irrational numbers cannot be expressed as simple fractions.
rational
The product of a rational and irrational number can be rational if the rational is 0. Otherwise it is always irrational.
Irrational
No, because 53 is a rational number that can be expressed as a fraction in the form of 53/1
No, 5.3 is not an irrational number; it is a rational number. Rational numbers can be expressed as a fraction of two integers, and 5.3 can be written as 53/10. Therefore, since it can be represented as a fraction, it is classified as rational.
4.6 is rational.
Rational
is 34.54 and irrational or rational. number
Rational
Rational.
No
If x is rational the it is rational. If x is irrational then it is irrational.
No. A rational plus an irrational is always an irrational.
No, 5.87 repeating (written as 5.877777...) is not an irrational number; it is a rational number. A rational number can be expressed as the ratio of two integers, and since 5.87 repeating can be represented as the fraction 53/9, it qualifies as rational. In contrast, irrational numbers cannot be expressed as simple fractions.