No it isn't a perfect cube since if you start with 3, (3*3*3=27) and go to 4, (4*4*4=64) there isn't a number that multiplies by itself 3 times to equal 50.
Chat with our AI personalities
From 1 to 50, you have the following perfect cubes: 13 = 1 23 = 8 33 = 27 The next perfect cube (43 = 64) is outside the specified range.
no it is not 4 is a perfect cube
No, 148 is not a perfect cube.
No, 2 is neither a perfect square nor a perfect cube.
Because they are square/cube of an integer.