1 and 571. It is a prime number.
114.2
Since the digits of the number 1713 add up to a multiple of 3, the number is divisible by 3. Aside from itself and 1, the factors of 1713 are 3 and 571.
Yes, but it won't be a whole number or you'll get 285.5
Yes, if x is an integer divisible by 3, then x^2 is also divisible by 3. This is because for any integer x, x^2 will also be divisible by 3 if x is divisible by 3. This can be proven using the property that the square of any integer divisible by 3 will also be divisible by 3.
1 and 571. It is a prime number.
114.2
1, 2, 571, 1142.
Since the digits of the number 1713 add up to a multiple of 3, the number is divisible by 3. Aside from itself and 1, the factors of 1713 are 3 and 571.
Yes, but it won't be a whole number or you'll get 285.5
No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.
It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.
A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3.
Yes, if x is an integer divisible by 3, then x^2 is also divisible by 3. This is because for any integer x, x^2 will also be divisible by 3 if x is divisible by 3. This can be proven using the property that the square of any integer divisible by 3 will also be divisible by 3.
NO. 313 is not divisible by 3.A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of the digits is divisible by 3.313 = 3 + 1 + 3 = 7Note: 7 not divisible by 3 thus, 313 is not divisible by 3.
3 is not divisible by 126. 126 is divisible by 3.
1x6,743 not divisible by 2 no its not divisible by 3????