No, they are not relatively prime.
Wiki User
∙ 2016-02-08 11:42:33Wiki User
∙ 2011-10-16 21:25:27No.
Anonymous
prime
It can be. 26 is relatively prime to 27. 26 is not relatively prime to 34.
It can be. 27 is relatively prime to 28.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
3
Yes.
27 is not a prime number and i dont know about 117 but i dont think its a composite # * * * * * The person who gave the above answer has no understanding of "relative primes". Or primes, for that matter. Neither 8 nor 9 is a prime BUT 8 and 9 are relatively prime (or co-prime) because they have no factor in common. That is what relatively prime means. 117 is not a prime, even if the previous answerer thinks otherwise. 27 and 117 are not relatively prime because both are divisible by 3.
No, they are not relatively prime.
No, they are not.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
It can be. 26 is relatively prime to 27. 26 is not relatively prime to 34.
It can be. 27 is relatively prime to 28.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
3
14 = 2 × 7 27 = 3³ → hcf(14, 27) = 1 → 14 and 27 are relatively prime.
No. they are not
Yes! Ten and Twenty-seven are relatively prime.
Yes.