Yes.
Every number is divisible by every other number except 0. Therefore the answer is yes.
If you actually meant is 834 evenly divisible by 2, 3, 5, 9 or 10 [with no remainder], then the answer is also yes because 834 is evenly divisible by both 2 and 3. It is not evenly divisible by 5, 9 and 10 but the 'or' in the question implies that it only need be divisible by one or more of the values, not necessarily all of them. If you really meant all of them, then the answer is no.
In short, 834 is evenly divisible by 2 and 3, but not by 5, 9 or 10.
It is obviously evenly divisible by 2 since 834 is an even number: 834 / 2 = 417.
It is obviously evenly divisible by 3 since 834 / 3 is 278.
It is obviously not evenly divisible by 5 since the least-significant digit (4) is neither 5 nor 0.
It is obviously not evenly divisible by 9 because the digits do not recursively add up to 9. That is, 8 + 3 + 4 = 15 => 1 + 5 = 6. Ergo, 6 <> 9 therefore 834 is not evenly divisible by 9.
It is obviously not evenly divisible by 10 since the least-significant digit (4) is not 0.
The positive integer factor pairs of 834 are:1, 8342, 4173, 2786, 139
It is divisible by 2 and 3. It isn't divisible by 5 and 10.
9 is divisible by 3 10 is divisible by 2, 5 and 10. Everything else, no.
No since only numbers in which its sum can be divisible by 3 is divisible by 3. 2 + 4 + 4 is 10, and 10 is not divisible by 3.
It is evenly divisible by 2 and by 3.
The positive integer factor pairs of 834 are:1, 8342, 4173, 2786, 139
It is divisible by 2 and 3. It isn't divisible by 5 and 10.
It is evenly divisible by 2 and 10 but not by 3 and 9.
Yes, it is divisible by 2, 3 and 9, but is not exactly divisible by 5 or 10.
9 is divisible by 3 10 is divisible by 2, 5 and 10. Everything else, no.
20 is divisible by 2, 5 and 10. It is not exactly divisible by 3 or 9.
It is divisible by 2, 5 and 10, but not 3 and 9.
It is divisible by 2 & 3. It is not divisible by 5, 9 & 10. 534 is even → divisible by 2 5 + 3 + 4 = 12 → divisible by 3 534 does not end in 0 or 5 → not divisible by 5 5 + 3 + 4 = 12 → not divisible by 9 534 does not end in 0 → not divisible by 10
No since only numbers in which its sum can be divisible by 3 is divisible by 3. 2 + 4 + 4 is 10, and 10 is not divisible by 3.
29,178 is divisible by 2, 3 and 9, not by 5 or 10.
The prime factors of 834 are 2, 3, and 139. 834 = 2 x 3 x 139, with 2, 3, and 139 all being prime numbers.
It is evenly divisible by 2 and by 3.