No, it is not. It is the sum of two consecutive integers: 46 and 47.
A rectangular number, also known as a pronic number, is the product of two consecutive integers. To determine if 93, 120, and 301 are rectangular numbers, we can check if they can be expressed as ( n(n+1) ) for some integer ( n ). 93 can be expressed as ( 9 \times 10 ), which is not the product of consecutive integers. 120 can be expressed as ( 10 \times 12 ), which is also not consecutive. 301 cannot be expressed as a product of two consecutive integers either. Therefore, none of these numbers are rectangular numbers.
They are: 93+95 = 188
96
96
The numbers are -95, -93, and -91.
46 & 47
The integers are 93 and 95.
If you define a rectangular number as a number which is the product of two consecutive integers, none of them qualify.
They are 92 and 93.
The numbers are 93 and 95.
Divide the sum of the three consecutive odd integers by 3: 93 / 3 = 31. The smallest of these integers will be two less than 31 and the largest will be two more than 31, so the three consecutive odd integers will be 29, 31, and 33.
They are: 93+95 = 188
Divide the sum of the three consecutive odd integers by 3: -273 /3 = -91. The smallest of these integers will be two less than -91 and the largest will be two more than -91, so the three consecutive odd integers will be -89, -91, and -93.
-33 + -33 + -29 = -93
96
If you define a rectangular number as a number which is the product of two consecutive integers, none of them qualify.
96