no it is not 4 is a perfect cube
No, 148 is not a perfect cube.
No, 2 is neither a perfect square nor a perfect cube.
Because they are square/cube of an integer.
It is both because 1,000,000 is a perfect cube and a perfect square number
k = 98. In the prime factorization (in power format) of a perfect cube, every prime must be to the power of a multiple of 3. 756 = 2^2 x 3^3 x 7 Thus the smallest perfect cube that is a multiple of 756 is 2^3 × 3^3 × 7^3; to obtain this need to multiply 756 by 2^1 × 3^0 × 7^2 = 98 Thus the smallest k to make 756k a perfect prime is k = 98.
no it is not 4 is a perfect cube
If by cube you mean perfect cube (a cube of an integer), then no, and the nearest perfect cube is 81.
No, 148 is not a perfect cube.
No, 2 is neither a perfect square nor a perfect cube.
Because they are square/cube of an integer.
It is both because 1,000,000 is a perfect cube and a perfect square number
A cube root of a perfect cube has only one dimension. A perfect cube is a number that can be obtained by multiplying an integer by itself three times. Taking the cube root of a perfect cube will give you the original integer value, effectively reducing the dimensionality back to one.
Not a perfect cube.
There is not a number that is a perfect square and perfect cube between 1 and 25.There is not a number that is a perfect square and perfect cube between 1 and 25.There is not a number that is a perfect square and perfect cube between 1 and 25.There is not a number that is a perfect square and perfect cube between 1 and 25.
81 is a perfect squarebecause 81 = 9*9. It is NOT a perfect cube.
It is a perfect cube.