It is an irrational number.
Actually it is a rational number. Think 2/3=.6666666, 1/9=.11111111.
A terminating decimal is a rational number. A non-terminating, repeating decimal is a rational number. A non-terminating, non-repeating decimal is an irrational number.
No, any repeating decimal digit is a rational number. It only states that it is non-terminating decimal. It is rational.
Not necessarily. Remember that the definition of an irrational number is a number that can't be expressed as a simple fraction. 2/3, for example, is rational by that definition even though its decimal form is a repeating decimal. Since irrational numbers cannot be written as fractions, they don't have fraction forms. So basically, numbers with repeating decimals are considered rational. Irrational numbers don't have repeating decimals.
No, the number 0.32323232323232... is not an irrational number; it is a rational number. This decimal is a repeating decimal, which can be expressed as the fraction 32/99. Since it can be represented as a ratio of two integers, it qualifies as a rational number.
A terminating or repeating decimal is rational. .333333...=1/3 5.09090909=509090909/100000000
No. A rational number is any terminating numeral. A repeating decimal is irrational.
Actually, a repeating decimal is not necessarily an irrational number. A repeating decimal is a decimal number that has a repeating pattern of digits after the decimal point. While some repeating decimals can be irrational, such as 0.1010010001..., others can be rational, like 0.3333... which is equal to 1/3. Irrational numbers are numbers that cannot be expressed as a simple fraction, and they have non-repeating, non-terminating decimal representations.
A terminating decimal is a rational number. A non-terminating, repeating decimal is a rational number. A non-terminating, non-repeating decimal is an irrational number.
No. It is a rational number. Any repeating decimal or terminating decimal is rational.
No, any repeating decimal digit is a rational number. It only states that it is non-terminating decimal. It is rational.
Irrational numbers can not be repeating decimals. Any number that is a repeating decimal is rational.
3501225 is a rational number. (It is even a natural number.) (Decimal representation of an irrational number has not terminating or repeating decimals.)
A number with a finite number of decimal digits is always rational. (If the number of decimal digits is infinite, the number is rational only if there is a repeating pattern.)
If its decimal representation is either terminating or a repeating number then it is rational. Otherwise it is irrational.
If a number can be expressed as a terminating or repeating decimal then it is rational (and conversely). So -3 is rational.
Any repeating decimal digits (this includes repetition after a certain point, e.g. 2.4510101010...) is a rational number.
No. Any terminating or repeating decimal is rational.