There is no simple answer.The mass of a nucleus depends on the number of neutrons and protons in the nucleus. The number of protons in the nucleus depends on the element. Moreover, the number of neutrons can vary between isotopes of the same element.
If you have some mass in nanograms, divide the number by 1,000,000,000,000 (1 trillion) to get the same mass in kilograms. 1 kilogram = 1 trillion nanograms
It's the averaged weight of all of the known isotopes of an element. Elements have versions of itself that have the same number of protons and electrons, but different number of neutrons. Since protons and neutrons have a mass of 1 amu (atomic mass unit), you change the neutron number, you change the mass . . . even though the element is still the same. Ex: Carbon 14 and Carbon 12 are isotopes of carbon. Both carbon elements, but they each have a different number of neutrons (8 vs 6), so they have different masses.
mass is measured with a balance comparing an unknown mass with an object of known mass. weight is not measeured with the same tools as mass.
The atomic mass is the mass of an atom of that element in AMUs. (Atomic Mass Units)The atomic number, however, is equivalent to the number of protons in an atom of that element.The mass number of an atom is the total number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus of an atom. This is therefore always a whole number. The relative atomic mass of an element is the weighted average of the masses of the isotopes relative to 1/12 of the mass of a carbon-12 atom.It is a weighted average as it takes into account the relative abundances of the different isotopes (atoms of the same element but with different numbers of neutrons) of an element. This number is found in the periodic table.For example chlorine has two isotopes, 35Cl and 37Cl, in the approximate ratio of 3 atoms of 35Cl to 1 atom of 37Cl.The number of protons and neutrons in a 35Cl atom must add up to 35, the mass number. The relative atomic mass of chlorine takes into account both isotopes and is therefore 35.5.
No, the molar mass does not differ in isoelectronic compounds. Isoelectronic compounds have the same number of electrons and therefore the same atomic mass, resulting in the same molar mass.
Both C7H16 and CaCO3 have a molar mass of approximately 116 grams per mole.
Atomic mass and molar mass are similar concepts but not the same. Atomic mass refers to the average mass of an atom of an element, while molar mass is the mass of one mole of a substance. The mass number of particles can be the same in certain cases, such as isotopes of the same element which have the same number of protons and different numbers of neutrons.
You can work this out by dividing the molecular mass of calcium, 40, by Avogadros number, 6.02214129(27)×1023 mol−1 This will give you the answer as the molecular mass of an element is the combined weight of the number of atoms that make up one mole, which is the same as Avogadros number.
The molar mass of gold is 197g/mol and the molar mass of aluminum is 27g/mol. Therefore, the ratio of the molar masses is 197/27=7.296. To find the mass of gold containing the same number of atoms as 9.00g of aluminum, you would take 9.00g * 7.296 = 65.664g of gold.
yes it is
The molar mass of an element is equal to the atomic mass of that element expressed in grams per mole. It represents the mass of one mole of atoms of that element.
no, but sometimes they are equal.Added:Molecular mass differs from more common measurements of the mass of chemicals, such as molar mass, by taking into account the isotopic composition of a molecule rather than the average isotopic distribution of many molecules.As a result, molecular mass is a more precise number than molar mass.However it is more accurate to use molar mass on bulk samples. This means that molar mass is appropriate most of the time except when dealing with single molecules.
The molar masses of any two elements contain the same number of moles.
The molar mass of magnesium is 24.31 g/mol, while the molar mass of oxygen is 16 g/mol. To find the mass of 2.6 g of magnesium, you can divide 2.6 g by the molar mass of magnesium (24.31 g/mol) and multiply by Avogadro's number to find the number of moles. Similarly, you can do the same calculation for 1.6 g of oxygen and then sum up the molar masses to find the total mass.
To determine the mass of oxygen gas containing the same number of moles as 56 grams of sulfur, calculate the molar mass of sulfur (32 g/mol) and use it to find the number of moles in 56 grams. Then, since the molar ratio of sulfur to oxygen in a compound is 1:1, this same number of moles of oxygen gas would weigh 32 grams.
Since carbon dioxide (CO2) has a molar mass of 44 g/mol and molecular oxygen (O2) has a molar mass of 32 g/mol, the molar ratio is 44:32. Therefore, you would need less volume of CO2 to contain the same number of molecules as 20 ml of O2 at the same conditions. The exact volume can be calculated using the ideal gas law equation PV = nRT.