0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How do you construct a truth table for parenthesis not p q parenthesis if and only if p?
Assuming that you mean not (p or q) if and only if P ~(PVQ)--> P so now construct a truth table, (just place it vertical since i cannot place it vertical through here.) P True True False False Q True False True False (PVQ) True True True False ~(PVQ) False False False True ~(PVQ)-->P True True True False if it's ~(P^Q) -->P then it's, P True True False False Q True False True False (P^Q) True False False False ~(P^Q) False True True True ~(P^Q)-->P True True False False
True or false The independent variable is the variable that is changed in an experiment?
false
If the second day of the month is a Friday then the twelfth day of the month is a Tuesday true or false?
false
Are there more rational numbers then irrational numbers true or false?
It is false.
True or false every quadrilaterial is a square?
False because every quadrilateral is a four sided shape
What are the three main subdivisions of consequentialism?
The three main subdivisions of consequentialism are act consequentialism, rule consequentialism, and global consequentialism. Act consequentialism evaluates the moral worth of individual actions based on their outcomes, while rule consequentialism focuses on following a set of rules that produce the best outcomes overall. Global consequentialism takes into account the consequences of actions on a broader scale, considering the overall impact across all individuals.
Utilitarianism is sometimes considered to be a subset of?
consequentialism
What benefit can one get in performing consequentialism act?
Consequentialism is an attractive ethical approach because it provides clear and practical guidance – at least in situations where outcomes are easy to predict. The theory is also impartial.
Is consequentialism an ethical theory?
Yes, consequentialism is an ethical theory that focuses on the outcomes or consequences of actions. It holds that the moral worth of an action is determined by its consequences rather than the intentions behind it.
What has the author Steven Sverdlik written?
Steven Sverdlik has written: 'Motive and rightness' -- subject(s): Intenties, Consequentialism (Ethics), Consequentialisme
What is the definition of consequentalism?
Consequentialism is a moral theory that states the rightness or wrongness of an action depends on its consequences. This means that an action is considered morally right if it leads to good outcomes, regardless of the intentions behind it. Examples of consequentialist ethical theories include utilitarianism and ethical egoism.
What are two main ideas that define utilitarianism philosophy?
The two elements of Utilitarianism philosophy are happiness and consequentialism. All that is associated with happiness is good. Utilitarianism is based on utility. The concepts of good and evil are weighed between what is good for the individual and what is good for the greater community. In Consequentialism, an act is judged on whether it causes happiness for a greater number of people.
What kind of actions are proper for people to take?
This is the fundamental question of the study of ETHICSand, as an entire field of inquiry, it is impossible to give a simple answer. There are numerous ethical frameworks such as: deontology, consequentialism, communal consequentialism, individualist, erratic, etc. Each framework may apply in general or to specific circumstances and then each framework may be subject to disagreement between its very proponents.
What are the strengths and weaknesses of consequentialism?
Consequentialism is the belief that the outcomes of actions, the consequences of certain normative properties decide the rightness or wrongness of the action. This is a moral or ethical theory that insists that the outcomes of any given action are what decided the good or badness of those actions. The major problem with such a belief is that it does little to inform the person acting on what is good or bad. In moral or ethical philosophies the greatest good to the greatest amount is generally accepted as the proper standard by which to judge an action. From a hedonist's point of view pleasure is good and pain is bad take that belief and combine it with consequentialism and suddenly skipping work to stay up all night at an orgy makes a whole lot of sense. Consequentialism can lead to many bad ideas. A member of a certain society allows the other members to sacrifice his or her life to the angry gods who have refused rain on the thirsty people. The society as a group murders this willing sacrifice so the gods might be appeased and suddenly it begins to rain and the people are saved. It was a good thing, by the rules of consequentialism, to murder that person and the consequences served the many. An extreme and primitive example, but it illustrates a major weakness in consequentilism.
when There is no requirement to take action to identify and discipline those responsible for the unauthorized disclosure of Controlled Unclassified Information?
False
What does consequentialist mean?
Consequentialism is a moral theory that judges the rightness or wrongness of actions based on their outcomes or consequences. In other words, the moral value of an action is determined by the results it produces, rather than its inherent nature or the intentions behind it.
What is the result of True AND False OR True?
True AND False OR True evaluates to True. IT seems like it does not matter which is evaluated first as: (True AND False) OR True = False OR True = True True AND (False OR True) = True AND True = True But, it does matter as with False AND False OR True: (False AND False) OR True = False OR True = True False AND (False OR True) = False AND True = False and True OR False AND False: (True OR False) AND False = True AND False = False True OR (False AND False) = True OR False = True Evaluated left to right gives a different answer if the operators are reversed (as can be seen above), so AND and OR need an order of evaluation. AND can be replaced by multiply, OR by add, and BODMAS says multiply is evaluated before add; thus AND should be evaluated before OR - the C programming language follows this convention. This makes the original question: True AND False OR True = (True AND False) OR True = False OR True = True
