Yes, it is possible to be both an empiricist and an idealist, as these philosophical positions can be reconciled in certain contexts. Empiricism emphasizes the role of sensory experience in acquiring knowledge, while idealism posits that reality is fundamentally shaped by the mind or ideas. A person might adopt an empiricist approach to gather data and experience while simultaneously holding idealist views about the nature of reality or consciousness. This hybrid perspective allows for a nuanced understanding of knowledge that incorporates both sensory input and the influence of ideas.
Yes.
Idealist!Perfectionist!
yes you can write with both hands
yes
The y-axis. Although it is possible for both variables to be independent, or both dependent.
Both
An antonym of realist is idealist. Idealists focus on what could be or what should be, while realists focus on what is realistically possible or achievable.
an Idealist
No, Aristotle was not an empiricist. He believed in a combination of empirical observation and rational thought to understand the world.
Idealist
Yes.
Rationalism
The cast of The Empiricist - 2010 includes: Oriol Benet as Richard Hartmann
Berkeley is generally considered to have been an empiricist.
'Idealist' and 'fantasist' are two possible answers.
He was most definitely an idealist.
The main difference between an empiricist and a rationalist is that an empiricist believes that knowledge comes from sensory experience and observation, while a rationalist believes that knowledge comes from reason and logic.