No, it is an ambiguous case: there are two possible configurations.
Such a triangle would be impossible to construct with the given 3 dimensions because in order to construct a triangle the sum of its 2 shortest sides must be greater than the length of its longest side.
Use trigonometry knowing that the angle will be 60 degrees
No the given measurements would not make a triangle because in order to construct a triangle the sum of its smallest sides must be greater than its longest side.
It is not possible to answer the question with the information given - particularly with the form in which it is given.
Yes. That's always possible, but there's only one of them.
Yes, it is possible.
If you mean side lengths of 5, 4 and 1 then it is not possible to construct any triangle from the given dimensions.
Yes, it's entirely possible, and quite easy as well.
The given dimensions will construct a triangle which will almost look like a straight line.
no
Because the sum of the smaller sides is greater than the largest side and it is possible to construct one right angle triangle with the given lengths
Such a triangle would be impossible to construct with the given 3 dimensions because in order to construct a triangle the sum of its 2 shortest sides must be greater than the length of its longest side.
None because the given dimensions are invalid to construct any type of triangle
No because in order to construct a triangle the sum of its 2 shortest sides must be greater than its longest side and from the given dimensions 2+1 is less than 4 and so therefore a triangle is not possible.
Use trigonometry knowing that the angle will be 60 degrees
No, it is not possible to construct a cube of twice teh volume of a given cube using only a straightedge and a compass.
No, it is not possible to construct a cube of twice teh volume of a given cube using only a straightedge and a compass.