Neither is more, or less, useful than the other.
They are not comparable and are both essential to modern life.
How far into them you want to go is a matter of personal taste, but it is no coincidence that literacy is almost always spoke of along with numeracy. The 'social science' view is that being literate is not enough, a person - and indeed a society - needs to be numerate also.
Both of them are essential to an ability to communicate clearly, and to an understanding of the world around us.
Certainly. Math is much older than English.
The mathematical symbol for "more than" is >.
I don't think it is. The "golden ratio" is more of a math curiosity than something that is actually used in all sorts of places.
For some people, yes, for some no.
more than a cop and less than a math teacher
Certainly. Math is much older than English.
Some schools will give the student a choice between a math or laboratory science. If the institution does require a math, it would typically be a lower level, and not more than a college algebra.
The mathematical symbol for "more than" is >.
There is no such word as 'usfuller', more useful is correct.
I don't think it is. The "golden ratio" is more of a math curiosity than something that is actually used in all sorts of places.
The discovery of fire and of the wheel were far more useful than the telephone!
There is really no way of ranking languages in terms of importance, but a reason that English might be considered one of the more useful languages to learn is because it is so widespread. However, learning Spanish or French could be just as useful as English.
For some people, yes, for some no.
The discovery of fire and of the wheel were far more useful than the telephone!
more than a cop and less than a math teacher
me because you can actually use it.
Math is more straightforward - in general, answers are either right or wrong. English is subject to interpretation. Also, unlike English, the principles of mathematics are generally unchanging.