No, a parallelogram is not necessarily square.However, by definition, a square is always a parallelogram.
A rhombus is a parallelogram, but something that is a parallelogram isn't necessarily a rhombus.
No, the diagonals of a parallelogram do not necessarily bisect the angles. The diagonals of a parallelogram divide it into four congruent triangles, but they do not necessarily bisect the angles of those triangles.
Yes, that's a true statement.A rhombus is a special case of a parallelogram.
Not necessarily, but it can.
No, a parallelogram is not necessarily square.However, by definition, a square is always a parallelogram.
A rhombus is a parallelogram, but something that is a parallelogram isn't necessarily a rhombus.
Not necessarily.
Not necessarily.
No, the diagonals of a parallelogram do not necessarily bisect the angles. The diagonals of a parallelogram divide it into four congruent triangles, but they do not necessarily bisect the angles of those triangles.
No. Not necessarily.
Yes, that's a true statement.A rhombus is a special case of a parallelogram.
square * * * * * Not necessarily. It can be a rhombus.
Not necessarily, but it can.
A rectangle is a parallelogram, but a parallelogram is not necessarily a rectangle. This is because a parallelogram can be so many other things, like a rhombus or a square.
Not necessarily. Only if it is a rhombus.
Not necessarily. "Parallelogram" means only that the sides are parallel - e.g., a rectangle. .