yes,because in fresnel biprism the fringe width can be increased so that the dark and bright fringes can be seen clearly by naked eyes..but there is no such problem in fresnel biprism..
in young's double slit experiment, the pattern is the superposition of interference and diffraction. but in fresnel biprism it is purely interference pattern.
The equation is: nλ=d(x/l) where: n is Order of maxima λ is wavelength d is slit separation x is fringe separation l is distance from screen to double slit
Taking a lot of careful precautions.Design the sample (if any) with care so that there are no systematic sources of bias,look for and eliminate [as far as is possible] any external factors that might affect the experiment,Calibrate all measuring equipment carefully,Carry out the experiment with double-blind procedures so that no single person has complete knowledge of all the factors until all data have been collected. For example, a person giving a patient a placebo may unconsciously send out signals to the patient who may then respond differently.
You get 24 if you double 12.
B sharp, C double-sharp, D double-sharp, E sharp, F double-sharp, G double-sharp, A double-sharp, B sharp.
thd double of three is six.
A double-blind study.
this is just for induction test
this is just for induction test
Maybe the double slit experiment in an attempt to solve the standing mystery of wave-particle duality of electrons.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment
Double blind expiriment
becuase because
The word better contains a double consonant.
double touch method is better
You can double-check your calculations or data entry for accuracy, perform the experiment multiple times to ensure consistency, and compare your results with previous studies or theoretical expectations for validation.
double blind -hardvard teacher
In a double-blind experiment, both the participants and the researchers involved are unaware of who is receiving the treatment and who is receiving the control. This helps to reduce bias and ensure the validity of the results. It is considered the gold standard in clinical research.
no a double bar graph is better